Observing a colleague's session is a skill that most coaches are never taught. Without a framework for observation, the observer accumulates impressions without structure — and the feedback that follows is either vague ("great energy") or anecdotal ("I noticed that one moment when...").
this approach provides a specific observation framework that connects to session standards.
The Five Observation Questions
- What is the session outcome? Can you identify the Club Language phrase from watching the opening game alone?
- What is game involvement? Estimate the percentage of players who are engaged in decision-making at any given moment. Is it above 80%?
- What is ball-still time? Count the total time the game stops during the observed session. Is it under 5 minutes?
- What is transition time? Time the movement from one activity to the next. Is it under 20 seconds?
- How is the coach positioned and intervening? Are they on the sideline? Are drive-bys brief and individual? Are whole-group stops rare?
Giving Developmental Feedback
Feedback after peer observation should be specific, evidence-based, and forward-facing.
Not: "Your transitions were a bit slow."
But: "I counted 90 seconds between the Focused Practice and the closing game — I noticed you were repositioning the goals. Is there a way to set those up earlier? I've started doing it during the drinks break."
The feedback is specific (90 seconds, goal repositioning), evidence-based (observed, timed), and forward-facing (here is a potential solution, here is my own practice).
The Non-Evaluative Standard
this approach coach education has no pass/fail. Observation feedback should never imply that a coach has failed. It should always imply that a coach is developing — as all coaches are, at all stages.