Skip to main content
Blog/club-admins

club-admins

Measuring Session Quality: What to Observe and How to Record It

Session quality measurement in FDM uses five specific metrics. Here is the observation framework and how to use the data for coach development.

The Coaching Blueprint·2 min read·

Club administrators who want to implement this approach effectively need a way to measure whether sessions are meeting the standard. Without measurement, quality conversations are impressionistic rather than evidence-based.

This is the this approach quality observation framework.

The Five Measures

1. Game Involvement

Estimate the percentage of players engaged in game-based practice at any moment. Target: 80% or above. This can be spot-checked at four or five random moments during the session and averaged.

2. Ball-Still Time

Total time the game is stopped. Target: under 5 minutes across the session. Use a stopwatch on every full stop.

3. Transition Time

Time from the end of one activity to the start of the next. Target: under 20 seconds. Sample two or three transitions per session.

4. Coaching Position

Record whether the coach is on the sideline or inside the pitch during game-based practice. A simple tally: sideline = tick, inside pitch = cross.

5. Session Coherence

Can you identify the Club Language phrase from watching the session? Can you see the connection between the opening game, the Focused Practice, and the closing game? Yes/No observation.

Recording Format

A simple observation sheet with the five measures and a space for developmental notes is sufficient. The sheet should take no more than 10 minutes to complete and 15 minutes to debrief.

Using the Data

Aggregate observation data across multiple coaches and age groups to identify club-wide patterns. If ball-still time is consistently high across multiple coaches, the problem is likely in how coaches are planning their drive-bys. If transition time is consistently high, the problem is likely in session design (activities that require too much setup change).

Data-driven quality conversations are more useful than impressionistic ones. They focus the development conversation on evidence.